Recent Publications

Beyond the Confidence-Accuracy Relation: A Multiple-Reflector-Variable Approach to Postdicting Accuracy on Eyewitness Lineups
Preprint

Ayala, Smith, & Wells (under review)

Click Here

Cartridge-Case Examiners' Aversion to True Rejections: A Shocking Problem with Use of the "Inconclusive" Category
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Smith & Wells (2024)

Click Here

Telling Us Less Than What They Know: Expert Inconclusive Reports Conceal Exculpatory Evidence in Forensic Cartridge-Case Comparisons
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Smith & Wells (2023)

Click Here

Lay (Mis)perceptions of Suspect-Identification Accuracy from Biased and Unbiased Lineups.
Psychology, Public Policy, & Law

Ying, Smith, & Wells (2023)

Click Here

The rule out procedure: Increasing the potential for police investigators to detect suspect innocence from eyewitness lineup procedures.
Journal of Applied Memory & Cognition

Ayala, Smith, & Ying (2022)

Click Here

Do traditional lineups undermine the capacity for eyewitness memory to rule out innocent suspects?
Journal of Applied Memory & Cognition

Smith & Ayala (2021)

Click Here

Absolute-Judgment Models Better Predict Eyewitness Decision-Making than do Relative- Judgment Models
Cognition

Smith, Ying, Goldstein, & Fitzgerald (2024)

Click Here

Predicting and Postdicting Eyewitness Identification Accuracy on Forensic-Object Lineups
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Ayala & Smith (2024)

Click Here

The untapped potential of lineups: Using eyewitness memory to rule out innocent suspects.
Psychology, Crime, & Law

Smith, Ying, Ayala, & Goldstein (2023)

Click Here

The rule out procedure: A signal-detection-informed approach to the collection of eyewitness identification evidence.
Psychology, Public Policy, & Law

Smith, Ayala, & Ying (2023)

Click Here

Evaluating the claim that high confidence implies high accuracy in eyewitness identification.
Psychology, Public Policy, & Law

Smith, Smalarz, Ditchfield, & Ayala (2021)

Click Here

Psychology & Law Lab

Recent Publications

Beyond the Confidence-Accuracy Relation: A Multiple-Reflector-Variable Approach to Postdicting Accuracy on Eyewitness Lineups
Preprint

Ayala, Smith, & Wells (under review)

Cartridge-Case Examiners' Aversion to True Rejections: A Shocking Problem with Use of the "Inconclusive" Category
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Smith & Wells (2024)

Telling Us Less Than What They Know: Expert Inconclusive Reports Conceal Exculpatory Evidence in Forensic Cartridge-Case Comparisons
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Smith & Wells (2023)

Lay (Mis)perceptions of Suspect-Identification Accuracy from Biased and Unbiased Lineups.
Psychology, Public Policy, & Law

Ying, Smith, & Wells (2023)

The rule out procedure: Increasing the potential for police investigators to detect suspect innocence from eyewitness lineup procedures.
Journal of Applied Memory & Cognition

Ayala, Smith, & Ying (2022)

Do traditional lineups undermine the capacity for eyewitness memory to rule out innocent suspects?
Journal of Applied Memory & Cognition

Smith & Ayala (2021)

Absolute-Judgment Models Better Predict Eyewitness Decision-Making than do Relative- Judgment Models
Cognition

Smith, Ying, Goldstein, & Fitzgerald (2024)

Predicting and Postdicting Eyewitness Identification Accuracy on Forensic-Object Lineups
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Ayala & Smith (2024)

The untapped potential of lineups: Using eyewitness memory to rule out innocent suspects.
Psychology, Crime, & Law

Smith, Ying, Ayala, & Goldstein (2023)

The rule out procedure: A signal-detection-informed approach to the collection of eyewitness identification evidence.
Psychology, Public Policy, & Law

Smith, Ayala, & Ying (2023)

Evaluating the claim that high confidence implies high accuracy in eyewitness identification.
Psychology, Public Policy, & Law

Smith, Smalarz, Ditchfield, & Ayala (2021)

Interested in Joining Our Lab?
Fill Out Form Linked Below

Recent Publications

Beyond the Confidence-Accuracy Relation: A Multiple-Reflector-Variable Approach to Postdicting Accuracy on Eyewitness Lineups Preprint Ayala, Smith, & Wells (under review)

Cartridge-Case Examiners' Aversion to True Rejections: A Shocking Problem with Use of the "Inconclusive" Category Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition Smith & Wells (2024)

Telling Us Less Than What They Know: Expert Inconclusive Reports Conceal Exculpatory Evidence in Forensic Cartridge-Case Comparisons Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition Smith & Wells (2023)

Lay (Mis)perceptions of Suspect-Identification Accuracy from Biased and Unbiased Lineups. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law Ying, Smith, & Wells (2023)

The rule out procedure: Increasing the potential for police investigators to detect suspect innocence from eyewitness lineup procedures. Journal of Applied Memory & Cognition Ayala, Smith, & Ying (2022)

Do traditional lineups undermine the capacity for eyewitness memory to rule out innocent suspects? Journal of Applied Memory & Cognition Smith & Ayala (2021)

Absolute-Judgment Models Better Predict Eyewitness Decision-Making than do Relative- Judgment Models Cognition Smith, Ying, Goldstein, & Fitzgerald (2024)

Predicting and Postdicting Eyewitness Identification Accuracy on Forensic-Object Lineups Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition Ayala & Smith (2024)

The untapped potential of lineups: Using eyewitness memory to rule out innocent suspects. Psychology, Crime, & Law Smith, Ying, Ayala, & Goldstein (2023)

The rule out procedure: A signal-detection-informed approach to the collection of eyewitness identification evidence. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law Smith, Ayala, & Ying (2023)

Evaluating the claim that high confidence implies high accuracy in eyewitness identification. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law Smith, Smalarz, Ditchfield, & Ayala (2021)

Beyond the Confidence-Accuracy Relation: A Multiple-Reflector-Variable Approach to Postdicting Accuracy on Eyewitness Lineups
Preprint

Ayala, Smith, & Wells (under review)

Cartridge-Case Examiners' Aversion to True Rejections: A Shocking Problem with Use of the "Inconclusive" Category
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Smith & Wells (2024)

Telling Us Less Than What They Know: Expert Inconclusive Reports Conceal Exculpatory Evidence in Forensic Cartridge-Case Comparisons
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Smith & Wells (2023)

Lay (Mis)perceptions of Suspect-Identification Accuracy from Biased and Unbiased Lineups.
Psychology, Public Policy, & Law

Ying, Smith, & Wells (2023)

The rule out procedure: Increasing the potential for police investigators to detect suspect innocence from eyewitness lineup procedures.
Journal of Applied Memory & Cognition

Ayala, Smith, & Ying (2022)

Do traditional lineups undermine the capacity for eyewitness memory to rule out innocent suspects?
Journal of Applied Memory & Cognition

Smith & Ayala (2021)

Absolute-Judgment Models Better Predict Eyewitness Decision-Making than do Relative- Judgment Models
Cognition

Smith, Ying, Goldstein, & Fitzgerald (2024)

Predicting and Postdicting Eyewitness Identification Accuracy on Forensic-Object Lineups
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Ayala & Smith (2024)

The untapped potential of lineups: Using eyewitness memory to rule out innocent suspects.
Psychology, Crime, & Law

Smith, Ying, Ayala, & Goldstein (2023)

The rule out procedure: A signal-detection-informed approach to the collection of eyewitness identification evidence.
Psychology, Public Policy, & Law

Smith, Ayala, & Ying (2023)

Evaluating the claim that high confidence implies high accuracy in eyewitness identification.
Psychology, Public Policy, & Law

Smith, Smalarz, Ditchfield, & Ayala (2021)