top of page
CA306F40-3DF3-4949-A20D-CFFBD7053C3E_1_105_c.jpeg

Recent Publications

Cartridge-Case Examiners' Aversion to True Rejections: A Shocking Problem with Use of the "Inconclusive" Category

Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 

Smith & Wells (2024)

Telling Us Less Than What They Know: Expert Inconclusive Reports Conceal Exculpatory Evidence in Forensic Cartridge-Case Comparisons
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
 
Smith & Wells (2023)

Lay (Mis)perceptions of Suspect-Identification Accuracy from Biased and Unbiased Lineups.
Psychology, Public Policy, & Law

Ying, Smith, & Wells (2023)

The rule out procedure: Increasing the potential for police investigators to detect suspect innocence from eyewitness lineup procedures.
Journal of Applied Memory & Cognition
 
Ayala, Smith, & Ying (2022)

Do traditional lineups undermine the capacity for eyewitness memory to rule out innocent suspects?
Journal of Applied Memory & Cognition

Smith & Ayala (2021) 

Predicting and Postdicting Eyewitness Identification Accuracy on Forensic-Object Lineups
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 

Ayala & Smith (2024)

The untapped potential of lineups: Using eyewitness memory to rule out innocent suspects.
Psychology, Crime, & Law
 
Smith, Ying, Ayala, & Goldstein (2023)

The rule out procedure: A signal-detection-informed approach to the collection of eyewitness identification evidence.
Psychology, Public Policy, & Law
 
Smith, Ayala, & Ying (2023)

Evaluating the claim that high confidence implies high accuracy in eyewitness identification.
Psychology, Public Policy, & Law
 
Smith, Smalarz, Ditchfield, & Ayala (2021)

bottom of page